Fork has different economic parameters than upstream
Venus Protocol's assessment for RD-F-132 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Venus uses substantially different economic parameters from Compound v2 defaults: BNB Chain-specific assets, different collateral factors, isolated pools with per-pool risk parameters. All deviations are audited by Venus-specific engagements. Yellow because the parameter deviations are extensive and the Compound-fork donation exploit demonstrates that inherited economic mechanics (exchange-rate accounting) remain load-bearing regardless of parameter changes.
Sources #
- GitHubIsolated Pools audits covering parameter deviationsIsolated Pools audits for new economic parametersretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's economic parameters (collateral factor, LTV, fee structure) differ from upstream audited defaults without a subsequent re-audit.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →