defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Bridge ecrecover checks result ≠ address(0)

Superstate's assessment for RD-F-151 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

[★ CRITICAL — N/A for this protocol] Native-per-chain issuance, no protocol-operated bridge; differs from spiko CCIP / circle-usyc CCTP. No bridge contract with ecrecover signature verification exists — the Wormhole-class vulnerability pattern does not apply.

Sources #

  • Internal
    00-profile.md §7Profile §7: has_bridge_surface = false; is_a_bridge = false; no bridge contract in repo or docsretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the bridge verifier code rejects `ecrecover` returns of `address(0)`.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol superstate factor RD-F-151 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 00:06:37