Fork has different economic parameters than upstream
QuickSwap's assessment for RD-F-132 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
V2: parameters (0.3% fee, k-invariant constant-product) identical to Uniswap V2 — no parameter delta from audited upstream. V3/Algebra: Algebra is not a Uniswap V3 fork — the dynamic-fee adaptive model is Algebra-original and was audited as such. Not a 'parameter deviation from audited defaults' scenario.
Sources #
- GitHubQuickSwap V2 Core GitHubQuickSwap V2 core — identical fee parameters to Uniswap V2retrieved 2026-05-16
- Code4rena 2022-09 QuickSwap ReportC4 — Algebra dynamic fee model audited as original designretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's economic parameters (collateral factor, LTV, fee structure) differ from upstream audited defaults without a subsequent re-audit.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol quickswap factor RD-F-132 score green collected_at 2026-05-16 08:48:31