Fork has different economic parameters than upstream
Lista DAO's assessment for RD-F-132 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Lista's fork differs significantly from MakerDAO original: (1) Dynamic stability fee (DynamicDutyCalculator vs MakerDAO's static fee); (2) AMO module for peg maintenance; (3) PSM adapted for BSC; (4) BNB-native and LST collateral types; (5) Upgradeable pattern vs immutable MakerDAO. AMO and PSM have 2024 BlockSec/Salus audits covering these parameter deviations. Oracle changes have 2024 PeckShield coverage. Core economic model changes are partially audited.
Sources #
- AuditBlockSec PSM Audit Nov 2024BlockSec PSM audit Nov 2024 — covers peg stability moduleretrieved 2026-05-12
- BlockSec AMO DynamicDutyCalculator Audit Aug 2024BlockSec AMO/DynamicDutyCalculator audit Aug 2024 — covers dynamic stability fee mechanismretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's economic parameters (collateral factor, LTV, fee structure) differ from upstream audited defaults without a subsequent re-audit.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →