defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Bridge ecrecover checks result ≠ address(0)

Jupiter Perpetual Exchange's assessment for RD-F-151 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

[★ CRITICAL — NOT APPLICABLE] Solana-only single-chain protocol, no protocol-operated bridge. The EVM ecrecover zero-address check pattern (RD-F-151) does not apply — there is no bridge signature verification contract and Solana uses ed25519/secp256k1 native programs rather than EVM ecrecover. State mismatch noted per briefing instructions.

Sources #

  • Internal
    Jupiter Perps Profile §7 — Bridge Flags and Solana SubstrateProfile §7 — has_bridge_surface: false, is_a_bridge: false; Solana substrate; EVM ecrecover pattern not applicableretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the bridge verifier code rejects `ecrecover` returns of `address(0)`.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter-perps factor RD-F-151 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 01:53:11