Fork has different economic parameters than upstream
Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-132 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not applicable — no upstream fork relationship. Economic parameter divergence from an upstream audit is not measurable because there is no upstream.
Sources #
- GitHubhyperliquid-dex/contracts repositoryhyperliquid-dex/contracts — original implementationretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's economic parameters (collateral factor, LTV, fee structure) differ from upstream audited defaults without a subsequent re-audit.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-132 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49