Fork has different economic parameters than upstream
Dolomite's assessment for RD-F-132 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Dolomite adds significant new economic parameters vs dYdX Solo: maxWei deposit caps, accountMaxNumberOfMarketsWithBalances (32 limit), expanded market support (hundreds vs ~10), operator whitelist for liquidations/expirations. SECBIT 2021 and Cyfrin 2023 covered these parameter changes for the Arbitrum deployment. However, the Ethereum mainnet (July 2025) specific parameter configurations (new asset markets: WBTC, USD1, srUSD, rUSD, weETH, CRV, AAVE, LINK, sUSDe) are not covered by any audit. Yellow: Arbitrum parameters audited; Ethereum-specific parameters unaudited.
Sources #
- GitHubDolomiteMargin READMEREADME: maxWei, accountMaxNumberOfMarketsWithBalances, operator whitelist — all new vs dYdX Soloretrieved 2026-05-16
- Dolomite on Ethereum: A New Chapter BeginsEthereum launch article: lists new Ethereum-specific markets (USD1, srUSD, rUSD, weETH, CRV, AAVE, LINK, sUSDe) — parameters not covered by any prior auditretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's economic parameters (collateral factor, LTV, fee structure) differ from upstream audited defaults without a subsequent re-audit.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →