Deprecated contracts still holding value
Veda (BoringVault)'s assessment for RD-F-166 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No deprecated contracts identified. The Se7en-Seas/boring-vault GitHub fork relationship reflects a same-team organizational rename (Se7en Seas → Veda Labs), not a contract deprecation event. Data cache coverage_flags.has_legacy_v1=false. No protocol docs, GitHub issues, or public records indicate a deprecated contract set holding material value. No on-chain evidence of retired contract addresses with >$100K TVL was found.
Sources #
- InternalData cache and profile §5Data cache coverage_flags.has_legacy_v1=false; protocol profile §5 fork lineage notes confirming same-team renameretrieved 2026-05-17
- Veda-Labs/boring-vault — fork relationship confirms org rename not contract deprecationGitHub Veda-Labs/boring-vault (forked from Se7en-Seas/boring-vault) — organizational rename, no deprecated contract set documentedretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether contracts marked deprecated by a protocol announcement still hold >$100K in assets.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →