defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Handle reuse across failed/rugged projects

Veda (BoringVault)'s assessment for RD-F-118 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No evidence of social-handle reuse across failed or rugged projects. The 'Seven Seas Capital' / 'Se7en-Seas' brand predates the Veda Labs rebrand and is a same-team organizational rename, not a fraudulent alias change. No alias-switch pattern found for any named founder. Web OSINT returned no rugged/failed project association for any identified handle (@sunandr_, @GoodStephV, @veda_labs).

Sources #

  • URL
    Se7en-Seas — GitHub OrganizationGitHub org Se7en-Seas confirming same-team rebrand to Veda-Labs; no fraudulent alias changeretrieved 2026-05-17
  • URL
    @veda_labs — XX (Twitter) handle @veda_labs — same team as @sevenseas_c; no rugged project history in search resultsretrieved 2026-05-17

Methodology #

Determine whether any social handle (Twitter, Discord) has been associated with a prior rugged or failed project under a different alias.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol veda factor RD-F-118 score green collected_at 2026-05-17 12:41:22