Formal verification coverage
Veda (BoringVault)'s assessment for RD-F-009 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Certora produced 2 formal verification reports (certora-boring-vault-0.pdf and certora-boring-vault-1.pdf) for BoringVault versions 0 and 1, stored in the audit directory. Exact invariant coverage percentage is not determinable from publicly accessible metadata (PDFs are binary, not parsed). Two Certora engagements indicates significant FV investment but specific coverage % is unconfirmed. Yellow: FV exists but coverage % cannot be verified.
Sources #
- GitHubVeda Labs — Certora formal verification PDFscertora-boring-vault-0.pdf and certora-boring-vault-1.pdf in audit directoryretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →