Team other-protocol involvement history
Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-113 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No prior rug or exit-scam affiliations for any team member. Hayden Adams' only protocol is Uniswap (founded 2018 with V1). VC-backed by a16z, Paradigm, USV — all conducted standard diligence. 2022 class action about third-party token issuers dismissed with prejudice 2026-03-03. No REKT.news entries attributing any Uniswap Labs principal to prior exploits.
Detail #
Combined v2+v3 assessment. The 2022 class action (Risley v. Uniswap et al.) alleged that Uniswap's platform facilitated third-party rug tokens. The suit was dismissed with prejudice by SDNY 2026-03-03. Uniswap Labs team members were not accused of creating or operating rug tokens — the suit challenged platform liability for third-party tokens. No team member has a prior adverse protocol involvement in any rug-labeled project per OSINT and REKT.news database search.
Sources #
- URLScam Token Case Against Uniswap Dismissed With Prejudice — CoinDeskCoinDesk — class action dismissal March 2026retrieved 2026-05-12
- Uniswap and Hayden Adams Win Dismissal of Class Action — BingXBingX news — class action win summaryretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Document current or prior protocol roles for team members (conflicts of interest, prior rugs, prior successful launches).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →