★ Empty cToken-style market (zero supply/borrow)

Evidence summary #

[★ CRITICAL — NOT APPLICABLE] V2 is a constant-product AMM; V3 is a concentrated-liquidity AMM. Neither is a Compound V2 fork. No cToken-style markets, no totalSupply/totalBorrow lending mechanics, no borrow-enable lifecycle, no donation-attack surface. V2 is forked BY SushiSwap/PancakeSwap/QuickSwap — it is NOT a fork of any lending protocol. ★ flag does not fire.

Detail #

Taxonomy §Category 4 PD-024: 'Compound-fork-only (subset of lending-only): RD-F-070 ★ — N/A for non-Compound-fork protocols.' Profile meta.json fork_lineage: v2_forked_from='not forked — original protocol', v3_forked_from='not forked — original protocol'; cat8_pre_mark='all_not_applicable_both_versions'. V3 whitepaper §1-3 describes concentrated-liquidity AMM design with no lending component. V3 Pool.sol implements swap() and mint()/burn() for LP positions — no borrow/cToken mechanics. V2 pair.sol implements swap() and mint()/burn() under constant-product invariant — no lending mechanics. V2 has been forked by SushiSwap (2020-08), PancakeSwap (BNB), QuickSwap (Polygon) — but V2 itself originated from V1 AMM, not from any lending protocol. Critical flag does not fire.

Sources #

Methodology #

Determine whether any listed Compound V2-fork market has `totalSupply == 0` and `totalBorrow == 0`, the precondition for a donation-exploit.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →