Historical bad-debt events
Uniswap (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-067 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Lending-only factor (taxonomy PD-024). No lending mechanism, collateral system, or socialized loss structure in V2 or V3. Zero protocol-level exploits in 6+ years combined. V2 oracle consumer failures (Visor, Inverse Finance) were downstream protocol failures — not V2 bad-debt events.
Detail #
Taxonomy §Category 4 PD-024: lending-only. Data cache rekt.incidents=[]. Profile §10: zero direct protocol exploits in V2 (6+ years) and V3 (5+ years). The 3 oracle-manipulation incidents (Visor Finance 2021-12, Inverse Finance 2022-04 and 2022-06) were failures of consumer protocols that read V2 TWAP output — V2 contracts worked as designed; no V2 bad debt resulted. Profile meta.json: v2_direct_exploit=false and v3_direct_exploit=false for all 4 incidents.
Sources #
- Curator noteTaxonomy PD-024 + incident registerTaxonomy PD-024 lending-only; data cache rekt.incidents=[]; profile §10 zero protocol-level exploits; meta.json v2_direct_exploit=false for all incidentsretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Count and sum (USD) the number of documented bad-debt events where the protocol socialized losses across depositors.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →