Emergency-veto multisig present
Sushi (SushiSwap) — v2 + v3 + Trident + BentoBox/Kashi + SushiXSwap's assessment for RD-F-040 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No emergency-veto multisig identified. Protocol has no formal guardian or emergency-veto role distinct from Ops Multisig. If a malicious Snapshot vote passes, the only check is the CORE team discretion not to execute. No on-chain veto mechanism exists.
Sources #
- Internal00-profile.md §6Profile §6 — governance topology lists no veto/guardian addressretrieved 2026-05-17
- Sushi Governance DocsSushi docs — no emergency veto or guardian mechanism documentedretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether an emergency-veto or guardian multisig exists with power to cancel malicious proposals before execution.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol sushi factor RD-F-040 score red collected_at 2026-05-16 19:50:37