Is-a-fork-of
Superstate's assessment for RD-F-126 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Superstate USTB/USCC is an original design. No upstream fork. GitHub repo superstateinc/ustb has no fork marker. README describes in-house AllowList + ERC-7246-extended architecture. No bytecode similarity to Aave/Compound/Uniswap evident. Protocol is an original RWA token issuance system.
Sources #
- Internalsuperstate/00-profile.md section 5 (fork lineage)Profile section 5: not forked / original; fork_date: N/A; fork_divergence: N/Aretrieved 2026-05-16
- superstateinc/ustb GitHub repository (original design, not a fork)github.com/superstateinc/ustb - no forked-from marker, original AllowList + ERC-7246 architecture per READMEretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Identify the upstream protocol this is a fork of (if any) via bytecode similarity, function-selector set overlap, or team declaration.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol superstate factor RD-F-126 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 00:06:37