ENS/NameStone identity bound to deployer
Superstate's assessment for RD-F-117 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No ENS name found bound to deployer EOA 0x589254a1a3d8ae95ce984900d505d91fd3ed167e. Etherscan institutional label 'Superstate: Deployer' confirms identity via Etherscan's labeling service (not ENS). For a corporate entity using Fireblocks MPC custody, ENS binding is not the typical identity mechanism. SEC registration and institutional Etherscan label serve an analogous accountability function. Not a risk signal; ENS absence is expected for institutional deployers. Scored yellow (factor applies to ENS/NameStone binding specifically; binding is absent, but alternative identity anchoring is strong).
Sources #
- EtherscanSuperstate: Deployer — Etherscan AddressEtherscan label 'Superstate: Deployer' on 0x589254...; no ENS name visible on address pageretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the deployer address has a bound ENS or NameStone name resolvable to a verifiable identity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →