Partial-drain test transactions
Superstate's assessment for RD-F-091 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
AllowList contract 0x42d75C8FdBBF046DF0Fe1Ff388DA16fF99dE8149 gates all USTB/USCC holdings and transfers. No permissionless mint/burn exists; an unauthorized wallet cannot execute a partial-drain test transaction pattern. The signal trigger (small-value drains prior to a larger drain) is structurally inapplicable to a permissioned RWA token where only allowlisted wallets can hold or transfer.
Sources #
- DocsSuperstate full documentation — AllowList architectureSuperstate AllowList architecture — only allowlisted wallets can hold/transfer USTB and USCC; unauthorized drain structurally impossibleretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Detect one or more small-value outflows prior to a larger drain that match a known pre-strike pattern (low-value same-function calls from new wallet).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →