Liquidity depth per major asset
Stargate Finance's assessment for RD-F-065 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Stargate is a bridge, not a DEX — standard 2%/5% price-impact slippage depth is not the right framing. Adapted interpretation: pool depth for bridging execution. Ethereum USDC pool: $12.3M (Etherscan, 2026-04-26). Arbitrum USDC: ~$18M (2025 search estimate). Per Stargate docs, slippage is kept minimal on stablecoin routes via the Delta Algorithm / AIPM. Dynamic equilibrium fees apply when pools are imbalanced, increasing cost for transfers from depleted chains. Risk: AIPM is an off-chain, Sta...
Sources #
- Curator noteExtracted from 04-economic.md — RD-F-065 finding; no URL cited in originalretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Measure on-chain liquidity depth for protocol-held assets at 2% and 5% price impact in USD.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →