Stale-approval exposure on deprecated router

StakeWise v3's assessment for RD-F-168 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Not applicable. StakeWise v3 is not a router-based protocol. The architectural pattern (Vault + osETH minting) does not involve routers with ERC-20 token approvals in the manner this factor measures. Legacy v2 contracts are fully separate from v3 and any stale approvals there are not a v3 protocol-level risk. No active deprecated router surface exists in the v3 architecture.

Sources #

Internal
StakeWise profile §5 and §3 — no router pattern00-profile.md §5: full architectural rewrite — v3 not a router protocol; §3: v3 uses vault/factory pattern not router approvalsretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Count the number of active user approvals (ERC-20 `allowance`) to deprecated router or protocol contracts.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol stakewise factor RD-F-168 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 01:03:28