Known-exploit-template selector deployed by any address
Spiko's assessment for RD-F-162 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No known exploit-template selector-pattern for Spiko's custom Permission Manager architecture deployed by any address in available public sources. Spiko's contracts use a purpose-built permission-manager with bitmask group membership — not a Compound/Aave-fork template. No exploit-template DB entry exists for this specific architecture pattern.
Sources #
- InternalSpiko profile — fork lineage (none)00-profile.md §5: Spiko is an original implementation, not forked. No upstream fork declaration.retrieved 2026-05-16
- Spiko Smart Contracts — custom Permission ManagerSpiko tech blog: custom Permission Manager with bytes32 bitmask group membership — original implementation, not a fork of a widely-exploited templateretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether any contract has been deployed containing a function-selector pattern matching a known exploit template targeting protocols of this class.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol spiko factor RD-F-162 score green collected_at 2026-05-15 22:52:13