Breakage analysis per dependency
Sanctum's assessment for RD-F-052 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
SPL Stake Pool program failure: wrong LST redemption rates across all SPL-based pools — affects pricing for all Sanctum products simultaneously. Single-LST pool failure: Infinity NAV impaired proportionally; Router routes for that LST fail; Unstake Reserve may not be able to honor instant-unstake for the affected LST. Multiple simultaneous LST failures: Unstake Reserve SOL liquidity faces bank-run pressure. Solana runtime failure: all operations halted. Gateway product failure: transaction delivery degrades but no TVL at risk.
Sources #
- URLSanctum Infinity Ultimate GuideSanctum Infinity pool holds basket of LSTs; INF yield = weighted average; failure in component propagates proportionally into INF NAVretrieved 2026-05-04
- 00-profile.md §7 and §11Architecture analysis from profile §7 and §11 multi-LST aggregation risk noteretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Produce a short per-dependency text describing which protocol functions halt or degrade and impact severity if each declared dependency fails.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →