★ Flash-loanable voting weight
Sanctum's assessment for RD-F-036 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Sanctum governance uses MetaDAO futarchy (decision markets, not token snapshot voting). Flash-loan voting attack requires point-in-time balance snapshot — futarchy decisions are expressed via conditional trading volume ($10 minimum per proposal). CLOUD supply multisig holders are explicitly restricted from participating in DAO votes. Flash-loanable voting weight is structurally inapplicable to this governance architecture.
Sources #
- Docs$CLOUD Genesis Mint and AccountabilityCLOUD Genesis blog: all 4 multisigs restricted from voting due to substantial CLOUD holdingsretrieved 2026-05-04
- Participate in Futarchy Governance | SanctumSanctum vote.sanctum.so — futarchy governance; proposals pass/fail based on market price signal, not vote countretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Determine whether governance voting power is a function of current token balance of a transferable token with no lock or checkpoint, making it flash-loan susceptible.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →