★ Flash-loanable voting weight

Raydium's assessment for RD-F-036 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No on-chain Governor contract. No Realms-based governance. No token-weighted voting contract. Governance is pseudonymous team via Squads multisig. Discourse forum is advisory only. Flash-loanable voting weight attack surface does not exist for Raydium's governance architecture.

Sources #

Curator note
raydium.discourse.group is fully decommissioned (DNS no longer resolves; ECONNREFUSED). Raydium retired its Discourse forum at some point post-2023; no canonical replacement community forum exists - governance now happens via Twitter/X and Discord. archive.org is blocked from this environment. Grader to drop forum-existence claim or cite Discord/X as the live community surface. [dead-link, original: https://raydium.discourse.group]retrieved 2026-05-06
Docs
Raydium Protocol Security Documentationdocs.raydium.io/raydium/protocol/securityretrieved 2026-04-29

Methodology #

Determine whether governance voting power is a function of current token balance of a transferable token with no lock or checkpoint, making it flash-loan susceptible.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol raydium factor RD-F-036 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-04-29 12:31:55