Code complexity vs audit coverage

Raydium's assessment for RD-F-024 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

3 audit firms cover Standard AMM v4 (Kudelski, OtterSec, MadShield). 2 cover CLMM (OtterSec, Sec3). 2 cover CPMM (MadShield, Sec3). Coverage appears proportionate to complexity. LOC-per-audit-day not derivable from binary PDF. Marked yellow due to inability to compute precise metric.

Sources #

GitHub
Raydium audit directory (all 8 engagements)raydium-io/raydium-docs/tree/master/auditretrieved 2026-04-29

Methodology #

Determine whether the cyclomatic complexity or LOC-per-audit-day ratio exceeds the curator-declared credibility threshold for the audit to be meaningful.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol raydium factor RD-F-024 score yellow collected_at 2026-04-29 12:31:55