Code complexity vs audit coverage
QuickSwap's assessment for RD-F-024 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
V3 Algebra core: 1,833 LoC in 13 contracts, C4 contest Sep 26-Oct 1 (5 days). With 118 warden submissions, coverage is reasonable for a competitive audit. V2 core: ABDK 4-month review with FV — thorough coverage. Gap: V3 periphery (SwapRouter, NonfungiblePositionManager proxy implementations) at $451M TVL has no publicly accessible audit coverage. The proxy implementation complexity (multi-chain router, ERC-721 NFT management) at this TVL level makes the periphery audit gap a legitimate complexity concern.
Sources #
- AuditCode4rena 2022-09 QuickSwap ReportC4 scope: 1833 LoC, 5 days, 118 wardens — periphery excludedretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the cyclomatic complexity or LOC-per-audit-day ratio exceeds the curator-declared credibility threshold for the audit to be meaningful.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →