Auditor re-engaged after last exploit
Polymarket's assessment for RD-F-083 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No smart-contract-level exploit occurred — therefore no post-exploit re-audit is applicable. The CTF Exchange V2 audits (Quantstamp + Cantina, March 2026) are proactive version-upgrade audits, not post-incident re-audits. Template: gray = no prior exploits (N/A). Applying gray.
Sources #
- DocsPolymarket profile §8 audit tableProfile §8 — V2 audited by Quantstamp + Cantina March 2026 (proactive); no post-incident re-audit applicableretrieved 2026-04-29
- REKT NewsREKT leaderboard empty — no smart-contract exploit triggering re-audit obligationretrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether a reputable auditor performed a re-audit or incident review after the most recent exploit.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol polymarket factor RD-F-083 score gray collected_at 2026-04-29 16:25:39