Real-capital social-engineering persona
Pendle Finance's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No curator-flagged evidence of a real-capital social-engineering persona. The Penpie exploit (Sept 2024) involved an external attacker targeting Penpie's integration layer, not a Pendle team contributor building credibility via deposits. The March 2024 Twitter account hijacking was a social engineering attack ON the team (no fund loss, recovered in 2 hours), not a campaign BY a team contributor. No insider persona deploying ≥$1M to build credibility identified. Confidence: low (M-only factor; observable signals for negative finding are limited).
Sources #
- URLPendle Finance Responds Swiftly to Unauthorised Property Use — CoinliveTwitter hijacking — attack on team, not by teamretrieved 2026-04-29
- Explained: The Penpie Hack (September 2024) — HalbornPenpie exploit — external attacker, not Pendle teamretrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →