ENS/NameStone identity bound to deployer
Pendle Finance's assessment for RD-F-117 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No ENS primary name resolved to Deployer 1 (0x1FcCC097) or Deployer 2 (0x196e6d50) based on Etherscan address pages. The funding source for Deployer 1 (secretrick.eth) holds an ENS name, but this is the funding source not the deployer. No NameStone binding identified. Factor is gray (no ENS binding present — no signal in either direction).
Sources #
- EtherscanPendle: Deployer 1 — no ENS primary name | EtherscanDeployer 1 Etherscan — no ENS shownretrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether the deployer address has a bound ENS or NameStone name resolvable to a verifiable identity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol pendle factor RD-F-117 score gray collected_at 2026-04-28 21:09:40