Oracle role per asset

Orca's assessment for RD-F-049 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No external oracle provider exists; there is no oracle-to-asset mapping to enumerate. All pricing is reserve-based CLMM math (sqrt_price, tick state). Factor presupposes an oracle role assignment per asset, which does not apply to a pure AMM with no oracle consumption.

Sources #

GitHub
Whirlpool swap.rs — oracle account is internal adaptive-fee tracker, not a price feedorca-so/whirlpools — programs/whirlpool/src/instructions/swap.rsretrieved 2026-05-16
Internal
Profile §7: oracle_feeds empty; no Chainlink/Pyth/Switchboard00-profile.md §7 — no external oracle in swap pathretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

For each oracle, classify its role as Primary / Secondary / Fallback per asset/market.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol orca factor RD-F-049 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:39:16