defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Disclosure SLA public

OpenEden's assessment for RD-F-176 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No acknowledgment-time SLA published. There is no disclosure channel (F175 red), and consequently no SLA framework exists. Confirmed: no mention of a 72h or any other acknowledgment window in any OpenEden public documentation including docs.openeden.com, trust-and-transparency page, and main website. Per methodology: red = no SLA published.

Sources #

  • Docs
    Data cache — no bug bounty platform (no SLA possible)00-data-cache.json sources.bug_bounty all null — no platform with SLA termsretrieved 2026-05-16
  • Docs
    OpenEden docs — trust-and-transparency (no SLA found)docs.openeden.com — no SLA or acknowledgment window published anywhere in documentationretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the protocol publishes an acknowledgment-time SLA for disclosed vulnerabilities (e.g., 72h ack).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol openeden factor RD-F-176 score red collected_at 2026-05-16 10:11:45