Formal verification coverage
Multipli's assessment for RD-F-009 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No Certora, Halmos, Kani, or equivalent formal verification found in GitHub repo, audit reports, or protocol documentation. The README explicitly acknowledges four protocol-level design issues (yield sandwich, fee inconsistency, asset/share mismatch, share price impact during redemptions) that FV would directly address — confirming FV is applicable but absent.
Sources #
- GitHubMultipli Barebones-MultipliVault GitHub — no FV evidenceBarebones-MultipliVault README — Known Issues section, no FV spec filesretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol multipli factor RD-F-009 score red collected_at 2026-05-17 11:48:35