ENS/NameStone identity bound to deployer
Midas's assessment for RD-F-117 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Deployer 0xa0819ae43115420beb161193b8d8ba64c9f9facc has no ENS reverse record. Etherscan public name tag 'Midas RWA: Old Deployer' is a public label applied by Etherscan community, not an ENS/NameStone reverse resolution. No NameStone binding found. For an institutional deployer this is typical and not a safety concern, but the factor definition scores red when no ENS/NameStone binding exists.
Sources #
- EtherscanMidas RWA: Old Deployer — Etherscan (no ENS reverse record)Etherscan deployer page — no ENS name shown; public label is Etherscan community tag not ENS reverse recordretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the deployer address has a bound ENS or NameStone name resolvable to a verifiable identity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol midas factor RD-F-117 score red collected_at 2026-05-16 09:34:55