Large governance proposal queued

Midas's assessment for RD-F-101 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Large governance proposal queued signal. Midas is corporate-governed (Midas Software GmbH) with no on-chain governor contract, no Snapshot space, no governance token, and no proposal queue mechanism. Signal is architecturally inapplicable — no governance infrastructure exists to produce or queue proposals.

Sources #

Docs
Midas Documentation — corporate governance modeldocs.midas.app — Midas Software GmbH corporate governance, no DAO, no token-based votingretrieved 2026-05-16
Internal
Midas — no on-chain governance infrastructure00-data-cache.json: governance.type=unknown, all governance fields null; 00-profile.md §6: no governor contract, no Snapshot, no Aragon, no governance tokenretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect whether a governance proposal with potentially protocol-impactful payload has been queued for execution (including Security-Council threshold-reduction variant).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol midas factor RD-F-101 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 09:34:55