Breakage analysis per dependency

Meteora's assessment for RD-F-052 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Breakage analysis partial. Core swap products (DLMM, DAMM v2, DBC) are self-contained; no external dep failure impairs their swap execution. Dynamic Vault: Solend/Tulip failure could impair yield delivery and, if those protocols are exploited, funds deposited there are at risk. Hermes keeper failure halts rebalancing (liveness, not direct loss). No published Meteora-authored breakage analysis for vault lending dependencies. Scored yellow: major deps identified but no formal breakage document exists.

Sources #

Docs
Meteora Dynamic Vault DocumentationDynamic Vault risk management: allocation based on audit, open-source code, insurance coverage of lending platforms; automatic withdrawal if risk thresholds exceededretrieved 2026-05-16
Internal
Meteora 00-profile.md §7Profile section 7: DAMM v1 integrates with external lending protocols (Solend, Francium) for yield; DLMM/DAMM v2/DBC appear self-containedretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Produce a short per-dependency text describing which protocol functions halt or degrade and impact severity if each declared dependency fails.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol meteora factor RD-F-052 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-16 10:03:05