Code complexity vs audit coverage
Meteora's assessment for RD-F-024 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Seven-plus distinct programs each audited by at least 2 firms per version increment. MeteoraAg/audits contains 10 subdirectories with 40+ individual audit PDFs covering DLMM, DAMM v1, DAMM v2, DBC, Alpha Vault, Dynamic Vault, Stake2Earn, Zap, Dynamic Fee Sharing, Presale Vault. README policy: at least 2 different auditors each time a new version is released. This per-version multi-firm model provides adequate coverage relative to code complexity.
Sources #
- GitHubMeteora Program Audit Reports RepositoryMeteoraAg/audits - 10 subdirectories, 40+ PDFs, multi-firm per-version modelretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the cyclomatic complexity or LOC-per-audit-day ratio exceeds the curator-declared credibility threshold for the audit to be meaningful.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →