Formal verification coverage
Meteora's assessment for RD-F-009 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No formal verification using Certora, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent found for any Meteora program. No FV report in MeteoraAg/audits or MeteoraAg org. Formal verification for Solana/Rust programs is not standard practice (no Certora-equivalent at production scale for Anchor). Score is red by the literal factor standard (0% FV coverage), though this reflects the Solana ecosystem norm rather than a Meteora-specific failure.
Sources #
- GitHubMeteora Program Audit Reports RepositoryMeteoraAg/audits - no FV report directory or FV-type PDF foundretrieved 2026-05-16
- MeteoraAg GitHub OrganizationMeteoraAg org - no FV specification repository foundretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →