Sybil surge of identical-pattern transactions

M^0's assessment for RD-F-097 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Core MinterGateway is permissioned (Minters and Validators are KYC'd institutional counterparties added via TTG governance). This structural design significantly reduces sybil surface on core protocol. Bridge portals (HubPortal, Portal Lite) accept transactions from any EVM address but no sybil-surge pattern observed in available TVL/transaction data. T-09 phase-2 signal tier.

Sources #

Docs
M0 TTG Governance Overview — permissioned Minter/Validator rolesTTG Governance overview: Minters and Validators are permissioned roles managed via Registrar governance; structural sybil resistance on core MinterGateway by designretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect multiple new EOAs submitting identical transaction patterns within a short window (sybil setup pattern).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol m0 factor RD-F-097 score green collected_at 2026-05-16 09:46:19