Liquidity depth per major asset
M^0's assessment for RD-F-065 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Secondary $M liquidity depth at 2%/5% price impact is not quantifiable from available free-tier sources. DefiLlama pool-specific data requires HTML rendering (403); Dune Analytics is JS-rendered (403). SwapFacility contract (0xB6807116b3B1B321a390594e31ECD6e0076f6278) and UniswapV3Adapter (0x023bd2F0A95373C55FC8D1c5F8e60cC3B9Bc4f4b) are documented in the protocol addresses, indicating $M has DEX integrations. Peg is primarily maintained by Minter arbitrage incentives rather than AMM depth. No documented depeg events found. Liquidity depth requires a paid subgraph or Dune query to quantify; data gap accepted rather than fabricated.
Sources #
- InternalM0 Protocol Profile §7 — External Dependencies.research/protocols/m0/00-profile.md §7 — SwapFacility 0xB6807116b3B1B321a390594e31ECD6e0076f6278 and UniswapV3Adapter 0x023bd2F0A95373C55FC8D1c5F8e60cC3B9Bc4f4b documented; peg mechanism described as Minter arbitrageretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Measure on-chain liquidity depth for protocol-held assets at 2% and 5% price impact in USD.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →