Repo shows AI-tool co-authorship in critical files
Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-172 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
The 10 most recent commits to evm-smart-contracts (2026-04-15 to 2026-04-20) were reviewed: commit messages show standard development work (format pauseMintBurn function, enforce mint/burn allowance check, add MintBurnExpectedPaused error, refactor validation logic, audit report uploads). No 'Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot]' or Copilot/ChatGPT co-authorship trailers found in commit messages. No AI co-authorship metadata detected in security-critical files. Confidence medium — only top 10 commits reviewed; exhaustive historical scan not performed.
Sources #
- GitHublombard-finance/evm-smart-contracts recent commitsTop 10 commits reviewed: 2ab60e7, 63577bd, 23f7f6c, 6784d65, bfd3224, 8205cb1, c1f0f19, 3308690, cb510bb, f066bfb — no AI co-authorship foundretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Determine whether critical security files show commits with AI-tool co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Code Interpreter).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →