Bridge validator co-hosting
Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-150 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
15 institutionally diverse members across multiple sectors: trading firms (Galaxy, Amber, Wintermute), exchanges (OKX, Kraken), mining pools (Antpool, F2Pool), validator infrastructure (Chorus.one, Figment, Kiln, P2P), software/key-management (Cubist, Informal Systems), analytics (Nansen), plus 1 unnamed. Geographic and operational diversity across multiple jurisdictions makes co-hosting of majority unlikely. No formal ASN-level co-hosting verification performed. Yellow: qualitative diversity is strong; no formal independent verification of infrastructure separation.
Sources #
- DocsLombard Finance — Consortium MembersLombard consortium members — 14 named institutional membersretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Determine whether validators share ASN or data-center/custodian per on-chain and OSINT inference.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →