Bridge validator count (M)
Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-148 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Lombard Security Consortium: 15 institutional members (Galaxy, OKX, Kraken, Amber, Wintermute, Antpool, F2Pool, Chorus.one, Figment, Kiln, P2P, Cubist, Informal Systems, Nansen + 1 unnamed). Threshold: 10-of-15. CCIP adds a second independent validation layer via Chainlink RMN. Hyperlane Mailbox uses same Consortium checkProof(). Effective validator count for all Lombard-native bridge paths: 15. 15 >= 7 (green criterion for >=7 validators). Consortium.sol _checkProof() enforces weight-based threshold.
Sources #
- DocsLombard Finance — Consortium MembersLombard consortium members documentation — 15 institutional membersretrieved 2026-05-05
- Lombard Consortium.sol sourceConsortium.sol — _checkProof() weight-based threshold enforcementretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Count the number of distinct validators or signers in the bridge's signer set (for non-LZ bridges; use F179 for LayerZero OFT).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →