Liquidity depth per major asset
Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-065 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
LBTC secondary market DEX liquidity depth was not formally quantified (no 2%-slippage subgraph query run; data not in cache). Qualitative assessment: Lombard docs classify Liquidity Risk as MEDIUM, noting 'redemptions involve a Babylon unbonding period where BTC remains inaccessible.' The DeFi vault (LBTCv) holds $161M+ in deployed strategy TVL but this is not DEX exit liquidity. During BTC price stress events, leveraged LBTC positions would need secondary market depth to avoid forced selling at discount. The $1.07B TVL without commensurate DEX liquidity is the primary economic risk vector. Score: yellow pending quantification.
Sources #
- DocsLombard FAQs — Lombard DocsLombard FAQ: LBTC unbonding from Babylon requires waiting period before BTC is released; redemption is not instantretrieved 2026-05-05
- Lombard: Bitcoin Capital Markets Onchain — VaultsLombard blog: DeFi vault (LBTCv) holds $161M+ TVL — deployed strategy, not DEX exit liquidityretrieved 2026-05-05
- LBTC Risks — Lombard DocsLombard docs risk page: 'Liquidity Risk (MEDIUM): Secondary market liquidity depends on market conditions. Redemptions involve a Babylon unbonding period where BTC remains inaccessible.'retrieved 2026-05-05
- Data gap — LBTC DEX 2% slippage depth not quantifiedCurator note: No Uniswap/Curve subgraph query executed for LBTC pool depth at 2% price impact; data gap notedretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Measure on-chain liquidity depth for protocol-held assets at 2% and 5% price impact in USD.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →