Hot-wallet signer flag

Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-030 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Cannot assess hot-wallet signing patterns for 5 pseudonymous signer addresses without publicly attested identities or signing behavior analysis.

Sources #

Curator note
All 5 Safe signer addresses unlabeled on Etherscan; no ENS or public attestation foundretrieved 2026-05-05

Methodology #

Determine whether ≥1 multisig signer address exhibits on-chain behavior consistent with a hot wallet (web-wallet signing pattern, no hardware signing indicators).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol lombard factor RD-F-030 score gray collected_at 2026-05-05 12:03:08