defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Dependency manifest uses unpinned versions

Lista DAO's assessment for RD-F-133 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

package.json: @openzeppelin/contracts pinned at 4.6.0 (locked — good), @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable pinned at 4.6.0 (locked — good), @chainlink/contracts uses ^0.4.1 (not pinned — will resolve to latest compatible minor). .gitmodules: forge-std submodule has NO pinned commit SHA. OZ (security-critical) is pinned; forge-std (development tooling) and Chainlink are not fully pinned.

Sources #

  • GitHub
    Lista DAO .gitmodules.gitmodules — forge-std submodule with no pinned commit SHAretrieved 2026-05-12
  • GitHub
    Lista DAO package.json Dependenciespackage.json — @openzeppelin 4.6.0 locked; @chainlink/contracts ^0.4.1 unpinned; .gitmodules — forge-std no commit SHAretrieved 2026-05-12

Methodology #

Determine whether `package.json`, `Cargo.toml`, or `foundry.toml` uses `^` or `~` version ranges for security-critical libraries (OpenZeppelin, Solady, etc.).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol lista-dao factor RD-F-133 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-12 17:54:05