Handle reuse across failed/rugged projects
Liquity V1 + V2 (LUSD / BOLD)'s assessment for RD-F-118 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No evidence of any Liquity team member social handle being reused from a prior failed or rugged project. Active handles (@robert_lauko on X, @rick_liquity on X, GitHub RickGriff, bingen, danielattilasimon) trace directly and consistently to Liquity and legitimate prior associations (DFINITY, Aragon). OSINT review found no alias reuse pattern.
Sources #
- URLRobert Lauko (@robert_lauko) on XX profile for Robert Lauko showing consistent handle use at Liquityretrieved 2026-05-16
- Rick Pardoe (@rick_liquity) on XX profile for Rick Pardoe showing consistent handle use at Liquityretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether any social handle (Twitter, Discord) has been associated with a prior rugged or failed project under a different alias.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol liquity factor RD-F-118 score green collected_at 2026-05-16 10:35:50