Protocol-impersonator domain registered (typosquat)
Liquid Collective (LsETH)'s assessment for RD-F-161 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Typosquat domain monitoring requires a domain-monitoring feed (dnstwist or equivalent); not available from public web search alone. No specific typosquat domains targeting liquidcollective.io were identified in web search results. However, the February 2024 confirmed Telegram brand impersonation (tweet ID 1758521166703079743) demonstrates attacker interest in this brand, making typosquat domain registration a plausible threat. Domain variants requiring monitoring include: liquid-collective.io, liquidcollectve.io, 1iquidcollective.io, liquidco11ective.io, alluvial.finance adjacent variants. data-cache whois = []; no WHOIS registration data collected. Registration-date-to-assessment-date delta cannot be computed without a domain monitoring feed.
Sources #
- InternalLiquid Collective data cache - whois field00-data-cache.json whois = []; no domain registration data collected by pipelineretrieved 2026-05-17
- Liquid Collective brand impersonation report - X/TwitterFebruary 2024 Telegram brand impersonation confirms attacker interest in Liquid Collective brand; creates prior evidence supporting typosquat monitoring priorityretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether a typosquat of the official protocol domain has been registered in the last 90 days.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →