defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Real-capital social-engineering persona

Lido's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No curator-flagged persona building behavior observed. All current contributors have 5+ year public histories inconsistent with the Drift comparator pattern (6-month capital-deposit credibility build-up). Per process-learnings: mark gray and note Drift comparator; absence of public trace is expected by design for this attack pattern. No red signals found. Cannot confirm absence at OSINT tier. M-only factor by definition.

Sources #

  • Curator note
    Methodology grayNot assessable at OSINT tier per methodologyretrieved 2026-04-28

Methodology #

Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol lido factor RD-F-184 score gray collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:42