defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Sudden admin-rescue/ACL change without discussion

Lido's assessment for RD-F-123 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

All protocol-level admin and ACL changes route through Aragon DAO vote (5-day window, 5% quorum, mandatory research.lido.fi forum discussion) or post-July 2025 via EmergencyProtectedTimelock (minimum 3-day delay). Emergency GateSeal activations require 3-of-6 committee threshold and were established via documented governance forum proposal. No evidence of unilateral ACL change without governance discussion in last 180 days. GateSeal is one-time/expiring by design — cannot accumulate undocumented admin power.

Sources #

  • URL
    retrieved 2026-04-28
  • URL
    4561https://research.lido.fi/t/lido-v2-gateseal-committee/4561retrieved 2026-04-28
  • URL
    retrieved 2026-04-28

Methodology #

Determine whether any admin-rescue function or ACL change was committed to the repo or executed on-chain without corresponding public discussion in issues, PRs, or governance forum.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol lido factor RD-F-123 score green collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:42