Code complexity vs audit coverage
Kamino Lend's assessment for RD-F-024 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Code complexity not precisely measured (Rust LOC metrics require tool run); audit coverage density (5 firms, 7+ versions, FV + fuzz) is strong but exact LOC-per-audit-day cannot be computed from public sources.
Detail #
The protocol has 57 master commits (though LOC may be much larger). The audit density (8+ PDF engagements from 7 firms) appears adequate qualitatively. No specific cyclomatic complexity or LOC-per-audit-day metric computable without tool runs. Scored yellow conservatively — audit depth appears adequate but cannot be affirmatively quantified.
Sources #
- GitHub
Methodology #
Determine whether the cyclomatic complexity or LOC-per-audit-day ratio exceeds the curator-declared credibility threshold for the audit to be meaningful.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →