Real-capital social-engineering persona
Jupiter's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No evidence that any external 'team contributor' or 'external integrator' persona has built credibility via ≥$1M capital deposits specifically targeting Jupiter. The Drift hack UNC4736 operation used >$1M deposits into Drift's ecosystem vault — this is a Drift-specific DPRK operation, not a Jupiter one. No reports of suspicious new contributor wallets with large deposits targeting Jupiter's governance or programs. Gray: no confirmed F184-pattern persona detected; cannot confirm absence by design (M-only OSINT factor; reference pattern is Drift/UNC4736 for comparator).
Sources #
- URLhacksdatabase/hacks/drift-protocol-rekt.md — Phase 1 descriptionDrift hack DB — UNC4736 real-capital deposit operation (Drift-specific, not Jupiter)retrieved 2026-04-29
- process-learnings.md — dev-identity-analyst SAVE-TIME-NEXT-TIME sectionProcess-learnings.md: F184 guidance — mark gray + Drift as reference pattern; cannot confirm absence by designretrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →